Oldham v. Wallace

4 Ark. 559
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The statute (sec. 3, ch. II) of assignments expressly declares, that nothing in the act authorizing assignments, “shall change the nature of the defence, or prevent the allowance of discounts or offsets, either in law or equity, that any defendant may have against the original assignor, previous to the assignment, or against the plaintiff or assignee after the assignment.

The defendant below, in his plea of off-set, expressly avers the indebtedness of the assignor to him, “ before and at the time of the endorsement of the said writing obligatory,” arid certainly brings himself within both the letter and spirit of the statute. The plea is in all respects sufficiently formal, and, in our opinion, the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to this plea. x

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oldham v. Wallace, 4 Ark. 559 (Ark. 1842).

4 Ark. 559 (Oldham v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Lewis
57 Colo. 124 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1914)
Leavitt v. Peabody
62 N.H. 185 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1882)