Oldham v. United States

38 F.2d 634, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 1930
DocketNo. 154
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 F.2d 634 (Oldham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oldham v. United States, 38 F.2d 634, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375 (10th Cir. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

G. W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.

Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 16) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631.

The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hood v. United States
43 F.2d 353 (Tenth Circuit, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 F.2d 634, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oldham-v-united-states-ca10-1930.