Oldham v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Oldham v. United States

38 F.2d 634, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 8, 1930·No. No. 154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

G. W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.

Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 16) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631.

The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

G. W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.

Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 16) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631.

The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Oldham v. United States, 38 F.2d 634, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2375 (10th Cir. 1930).

Pincite

38 F.2d 634 (Oldham v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related