Oldham v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Oldham v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided May 9, 2008·No. I.C. NO. TA-17086 A.G. NO. 01-0174.·Published

Opinion

*********** Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-292 and Tort Claims Rule T303, defendants had 25 days after receipt of the transcript of the record to file with the Industrial Commission a written statement of the particular grounds for the appeal. Defendant failed to do so. Therefore, defendant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

This 23^rd day of April, 2008.

S/___________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

*Page 2

S/___________________ DANNY LEE McDONALD COMMISSIONER

S/___________________ BUCK LATTIMORE COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-292 and Tort Claims Rule T303, defendants had 25 days after receipt of the transcript of the record to file with the Industrial Commission a written statement of the particular grounds for the appeal. Defendant failed to do so. Therefore, defendant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

This 23^rd day of April, 2008.

S/___________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

*Page 2

S/___________________ DANNY LEE McDONALD COMMISSIONER

S/___________________ BUCK LATTIMORE COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Oldham v. N.C. Department of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2008).

Pincite

Oldham v. N.C. Department of Correction (Oldham v. N.C. Department of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related