Oldham v. M'Cormick
8 Blackf. 387, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 38
Opinion
TO render a bankrupt competent as a witness to increase the assets in the hands of his assignee, it must appear not only that he had no claim to a surplus of his estate, but also that he had received his allowance. Cully v. Ross, 7 Blackf. 312.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oldham v. M'Cormick, 8 Blackf. 387, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 38 (Ind. 1847).
8 Blackf. 387 (Oldham v. M'Cormick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cully v. Ross
7 Blackf. 312 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)