Oldendorf v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Oldendorf v. Pennsylvania Railroad

81 Pa. Super. 181, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 26, 1923

DocketAppeal, 122

StatusPublished

This text of 81 Pa. Super. 181 (Oldendorf v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oldendorf v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 81 Pa. Super. 181, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40 (Pa. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board affirmed the finding of the referee in favor of the claimant in the sum of $126. The court of common pleas, upon appeal by the defendant, affirmed the finding of the compensation board, but instead of entering judgment for the amount of that finding, inadvertently entered judgment in the sum of $426. This mistake the court subsequently corrected and modified the judgment so that it stands for $126, the amount awarded by the referee. The six judges who sat at the argument of this case are equally divided in opinion, and as a consequence the assignments of error are dismissed.

The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board affirmed the finding of the referee in favor of the claimant in the sum of $126. The court of common pleas, upon appeal by the defendant, affirmed the finding of the compensation board, but instead of entering judgment for the amount of that finding, inadvertently entered judgment in the sum of $426. This mistake the court subsequently corrected and modified the judgment so that it stands for $126, the amount awarded by the referee. The six judges who sat at the argument of this case are equally divided in opinion, and as a consequence the assignments of error are dismissed.

The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 Pa. Super. 181, 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oldendorf-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pasuperct-1923.