Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders

402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 19, 1981·No. 80-215·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The adequacy of damages vel non assessed by a jury verdict and judgment entered thereon is not an available ground for relief under Rule 60(b), ARCP; thus, this post-judgment remedy may not be substituted for a motion for a new trial.

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, JONES, and SHORES, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C. J., and BEATTY, J., concur specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders, 402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585 (Ala. 1981).

402 So. 2d 884 (Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. Walther
546 So. 2d 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Matkin v. Smith
531 So. 2d 876 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)