Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders

402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 19, 1981
Docket80-215
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 402 So. 2d 884 (Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders, 402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585 (Ala. 1981).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The adequacy of damages vel non assessed by a jury verdict and judgment entered thereon is not an available ground for relief under Rule 60(b), ARCP; thus, this post-judgment remedy may not be substituted for a motion for a new trial.

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, JONES, and SHORES, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C. J., and BEATTY, J., concur specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. Walther
546 So. 2d 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Matkin v. Smith
531 So. 2d 876 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oldemoppen-v-walther-builders-ala-1981.