Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders
402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585
Opinions
Affirmed. The adequacy of damages vel non assessed by a jury verdict and judgment entered thereon is not an available ground for relief under Rule 60(b), ARCP; thus, this post-judgment remedy may not be substituted for a motion for a new trial.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders, 402 So. 2d 884, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3585 (Ala. 1981).
402 So. 2d 884 (Oldemoppen v. Walther Builders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. Walther
546 So. 2d 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Matkin v. Smith
531 So. 2d 876 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)