Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 331
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 1, 1960
DocketNo. 63765; protest 261904-K/7000 (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 331 (Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 331 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

[332]*332Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved, in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 608), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the-claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-rose-distributing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.