Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 331
United States Customs Court·Decided February 1, 1960·No. No. 63765; protest 261904-K/7000 (Chicago)·Published
Opinion
[332]*332Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved, in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 608), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the-claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 331 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 331 (Old Rose Distributing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)