Old Pilgrim Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Monarch Life Insurance

11 Mass. App. Ct. 893
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided December 23, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

As the sole claim of appeal was directed to the interlocutory order allowing the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see and compare J.B.L. Constr. Co. v. Lincoln Homes Corp., 9 Mass. App. Ct. 250, 253 [1980]), rather than to the “final judgment” (G. L. c. 231, § 113, as appearing in St. 1973, c. 1114, § 202), the appeal must be dismissed. Nantucket Land Council, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Nantucket, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 206, 207, 216 (1977). If we were to consider the merits of the questions raised below (see Kelsey v. Panarelli, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 480, 482 [1977], and cases cited), we would affirm for the reasons given by the judge when he allowed the motion.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Old Pilgrim Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Monarch Life Insurance, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 893 (Mass. Ct. App. 1980).

11 Mass. App. Ct. 893 (Old Pilgrim Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Monarch Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seigal v. Fitz Taxi, Inc.
1986 Mass. App. Div. 42 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1986)