Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
This text of 242 U.S. 623 (Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Company v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Pierce v. Southern Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; Wood v. Chesbrough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (3) Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205. Mr. Eppa Hunton, Jr., Mr. E. Randolph Williams and Mr. Henry W. Anderson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. H. R. Pollard and Mr. Henry Taylor, Jr., for the defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 U.S. 623, 37 S. Ct. 244, 61 L. Ed. 533, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-dominion-iron-nail-works-co-v-chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-scotus-1917.