Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Lewisohn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Lewisohn

179 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5453

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 17, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F. 1023 (Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Lewisohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Lewisohn, 179 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5453 (circtsdny 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

This motion first came before Judge Noyes, who in his written memorandum intimated that, if the complainant had presented specific amendments to the different paragraphs of the original bill, he would have passed upon each of the proposed amendments and either allowed or disallowed them. Without endeavoring to pass specifically upon the various proposed amendments, it appears clearly enough that the amendments which the complainant desires to make to the original bill are thoroughly in line with its testimony, while the allegations of the original bill are not as claimed in accord therewith. Under the circumstances presented by the record, I am of the opinion that the proposed amendments should be allowed, and an order to that effect may be entered.

See, also, 176 Fed. 745.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAZEL, District Judge.

This motion first came before Judge Noyes, who in his written memorandum intimated that, if the complainant had presented specific amendments to the different paragraphs of the original bill, he would have passed upon each of the proposed amendments and either allowed or disallowed them. Without endeavoring to pass specifically upon the various proposed amendments, it appears clearly enough that the amendments which the complainant desires to make to the original bill are thoroughly in line with its testimony, while the allegations of the original bill are not as claimed in accord therewith. Under the circumstances presented by the record, I am of the opinion that the proposed amendments should be allowed, and an order to that effect may be entered.

See, also, 176 Fed. 745.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-dominion-copper-mining-smelting-co-v-lewisohn-circtsdny-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack