Old Colony Railroad v. Slavens

19 N.E. 372, 148 Mass. 363, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 271
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 19 N.E. 372 (Old Colony Railroad v. Slavens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Old Colony Railroad v. Slavens, 19 N.E. 372, 148 Mass. 363, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 271 (Mass. 1889).

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

The verdict establishes it as a fact, that the defendants might have done the work of transferring and loading the mail bags without obstructing the sidewalk as it was obstructed on the occasion of the injury to Amory. The plaintiff’s regulations and provisions did not require such obstruction, and the only question before us is, whether, assuming this as a fact, the plaintiff was entitled to recover. And we think the plaintiff and the' defendants were not, as to each other, in pari delicto. The plaintiff was held liable to Amory because bound to keep the sidewalk reasonably safe. But the ground of the present action is, that the defendants by their negligent act exposed the plaintiff to this liability. The plaintiff’s neglect to keep the sidewalk safe did not make the plaintiff a joint wrongdoer with the defendants in any such sense as to prevent the plaintiff from recovering. Milford v. Holbrook, 9 Allen, 17, 23. West Boylston v. Mason, 102 Mass. 341. Woburn v. Boston & Lowell Railroad, 109 Mass. 283. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co. 114 Mass. 149. Churchill v. Holt, 131 Mass. 67; S. C. 127 Mass. 165.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Roy Bros. Inc.
265 N.E.2d 357 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)
Hollywood Barbecue Co. v. Morse
50 N.E.2d 55 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Farrell v. Eastern Bridge & Structural Co.
197 N.E. 68 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Rea v. Checker Taxi Co.
172 N.E. 612 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Horrabin v. City of Des Moines
198 Iowa 549 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Western Light & Power Co.
214 P. 30 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1923)
Alaska Steamship Co. v. Pacific Coast Gypsum Co.
128 P. 654 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
Bradley v. Rosenthal
97 P. 875 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Brackett
53 A. 304 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. Kendall
51 L.R.A. 781 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Story v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
48 A. 288 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)
Consolidated Hand-Method Lasting Machine Co. v. Bradley
50 N.E. 464 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
City of Lowell v. Glidden
34 N.E. 459 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 N.E. 372, 148 Mass. 363, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-colony-railroad-v-slavens-mass-1889.