Old Clarendon Restaurant, Inc. v. Louis Roossin Soda Fountain Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Old Clarendon Restaurant, Inc. v. Louis Roossin Soda Fountain Co.

256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5488

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 926 (Old Clarendon Restaurant, Inc. v. Louis Roossin Soda Fountain Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Old Clarendon Restaurant, Inc. v. Louis Roossin Soda Fountain Co., 256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for judgment declaring a conditional sales agreement to be null and void [927]*927on the ground that its execution was induced by fraudulent representations, enjoining negotiation of promissory notes delivered in pursuance thereto, and for a money judgment. Defendant counterclaimed for a money judgment equivalent to the amount of unpaid notes and for foreclosure of a lien in such amount. Judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment on defendant’s counterclaim affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., concur; Carswell and Close, JJ., dissent, vote to reverse and for a new trial on the ground that the determination is against the weight of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for judgment declaring a conditional sales agreement to be null and void [927]*927on the ground that its execution was induced by fraudulent representations, enjoining negotiation of promissory notes delivered in pursuance thereto, and for a money judgment. Defendant counterclaimed for a money judgment equivalent to the amount of unpaid notes and for foreclosure of a lien in such amount. Judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment on defendant’s counterclaim affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., concur; Carswell and Close, JJ., dissent, vote to reverse and for a new trial on the ground that the determination is against the weight of the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-clarendon-restaurant-inc-v-louis-roossin-soda-fountain-co-nyappdiv-1939.