Old Ben Coal Company v. Ruby Jones, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

897 F.2d 900, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3925, 1990 WL 27100
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 1990
Docket89-2253
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 897 F.2d 900 (Old Ben Coal Company v. Ruby Jones, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Old Ben Coal Company v. Ruby Jones, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 897 F.2d 900, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3925, 1990 WL 27100 (7th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

This petition, brought pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (1976), arises from an order issued by the Benefits Review Board (Board) dismissing the appeal of Old Ben Coal Company (Old Ben) from a decision and order issued by an administrative law judge (ALJ) awarding benefits to Ruby Jones under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901 et seq. (1986). Finding that the appeal had not been filed within 30 days of the issuance of the ALJ’s opinion and order, the Board dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because we hold that the ALJ’s failure to comply with the statutory and regulatory sections requiring service by certified mail tolled the 30 day filing period, we reverse and remand for consideration on the merits.

I.

On February 12, 1981 administrative law judge (AU) Glenn R. Lawrence issued a decision and order awarding benefits to Ruby Jones under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., payable by her late husband’s employer, Old Ben, as compensation for his disability and subsequent death relating to his coal mine employment. Old Ben appealed this decision to the Board. While the appeal was pending, Old Ben changed its address from Chicago, Illinois to Lexington, Kentucky and notified the Board of this change by certified mail. On December 24, 1985, the Board issued an order which vacated the ALJ’s benefit award and remanded the case to the ALJ for reconsideration. A copy of this order was properly served upon Old Ben at its Lexington address by certified mail. On March 31, 1986, the ALJ issued a Decision and Order reaffirming his 1981 award of benefits to the claimant Ruby Jones. Unlike the Board’s decision, however, a copy of this decision was sent by regular mail to Old Ben’s Chicago address and was never received by Old Ben. Old Ben first became aware of the ALJ’s adverse decision on November 17, 1988, when it received a phone call regarding payment of benefits from the Department of Labor. Old Ben promptly requested a copy of the ALJ’s decision on remand and received it on November 21, 1988. Old Ben filed an appeal with the Board on December 6, 1988 — less than thirty days after Old Ben received actual notice of the ALJ’s decision, but more than two and a half years after the decision was issued and filed with the Deputy Commissioner. By a Decision and Order dated April 21, 1989 the Board dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. It found that the Notice of Appeal was not filed within 30 days of the issuance of the ALJ’s order, and that the improper mailing did not toll the 30 day time limit.

II.

As incorporated by the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. § 932(a), the law governing the time in which an appeal must be filed comes from the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. Section 921(a), which establishes the time for appeal, provides as follows:

A compensation order shall become effective when filed in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner as provided in § 919 of this Title, and, unless proceedings were suspension or setting aside of such order are instituted as provided in subdivision (b) of this section, shall be *902 come final .at the expiration of the thirtieth day thereafter.

(emphasis added).

Section 921(a) makes clear that unless application for review is made within thirty days after a compensation order is filed with the Deputy Commissioner, that order becomes final. Since the act of filing starts the running of the thirty day period, it is crucial to our inquiry to determine when a black lung decision is “filed” within the meaning of § 921(a).

Section 919(e), (the only subsection of § 919 which refers to filing and to which we are directed by § 921) provides;

“The order rejecting the claim or making the award ... shall be filed in the office of the deputy commissioner, and a copy thereof shall be sent by registered mail or by certified mail to the claimant and to the employer at the last known address of each.”

Whether § 919(e) requires proper service of a decision before it is considered “filed” is an unsettled question in this circuit. See Jeffboat, Inc. v. Mann, 875 F.2d 660, 662 (7th Cir.1989). Fortunately, the Black Lung Act regulations which supplement, and, where inconsistent, supplant sections adopted from the Longshore Act, define the term “filing” with such clarity that judicial construction of § 919(e) remains unnecessary. 1

20 C.F.R. § 725.478 provides;

On the date of issuance of a decision and order under § 725.477, the administrative law judge shall serve the decision and order on all parties to the claim by certified mail. On the same date, the original record of the claim shall be returned to the [Division of Coal Mine Workers’ Compensation] in Washington, D.C., and the decision and order shall be considered to be filed in the office of the deputy commissioner, (emphasis added)

Unlike § 919(e) of the Longshore Act, the language of the Secretary’s black lung regulation clearly conditions “filing” upon service of the decision on all parties by certified mail. Thus, the thirty day time limit for appeal does not begin to run until all parties are properly served by certified mail. 2 This view is consistent with: the decision of the Third Circuit in Patton v. Director, Office of W.C. Prog. etc., 763 F.2d 553 (3d Cir.1985); the decision of the Sixth Circuit in Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Benefits Review Board, 745 F.2d 380 (6th Cir.1984); and the decision of Fourth Circuit in Jewell Smokeless Coal Corp. v. Director, Office of W.C. Prog. etc., 892 F.2d 366 (4th Cir.1989). Recent caselaw from our own circuit further validates our reading of these statutory and regulatory provisions. In Jeffboat v. Mann, 875 F.2d 660

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 F.2d 900, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3925, 1990 WL 27100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/old-ben-coal-company-v-ruby-jones-and-director-office-of-workers-ca7-1990.