Olcott v. Cartwright

Fifth Circuit

Olcott v. Cartwright

115 F. 1020, 52 C.C.A. 685, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4294

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 20, 1902·No. No. 1,022·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After an attentive and careful examination of the voluminous transcript, and full consideration of the many assigned errors in the proceedings on the trial in the circuit court, aided by full oral argument and able and exhaustive briefs, we are constrained to hold that none of the errors assigned are well taken, and that on the face of the record there is no plain reversible error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After an attentive and careful examination of the voluminous transcript, and full consideration of the many assigned errors in the proceedings on the trial in the circuit court, aided by full oral argument and able and exhaustive briefs, we are constrained to hold that none of the errors assigned are well taken, and that on the face of the record there is no plain reversible error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Olcott v. Cartwright, 115 F. 1020, 52 C.C.A. 685, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4294 (5th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

115 F. 1020 (Olcott v. Cartwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.