Olavarrieta v. Metropolitan Dade County

633 So. 2d 61, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1994 WL 45008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1994·No. No. 93-1402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which upheld the Referee’s finding that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with his employment. The referee’s findings are supported by substantial, competent circumstantial evidence. See Lake Co. Sheriff’s Dept. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 478 So.2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (circumstantial evidence may support referee’s findings). See also Ordnance Research, Inc. v. Sterling, 475 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (in reversing decision of appeals commission that awarded claimant benefits, court ruled that referee improperly failed to determine whether employee’s conduct had resulted in financial loss [62]*62to employer, even if conduct did not rise to level of criminal behavior).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olavarrieta v. Metropolitan Dade County, 633 So. 2d 61, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1994 WL 45008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

633 So. 2d 61 (Olavarrieta v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lake Cnty. Sheriff's Dept. v. Unemp. App. Com'n
478 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Ordnance Research, Inc. v. Sterling
475 So. 2d 954 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)