Olasebikan v. Ashcroft

Fifth Circuit

Olasebikan v. Ashcroft

82 F. App'x 384

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 5, 2003

Docket03-30309

StatusUnpublished

This text of 82 F. App'x 384 (Olasebikan v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olasebikan v. Ashcroft, 82 F. App'x 384 (5th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Sunday Olakanpo Olasebikan, Federal prisoner # 04895-078, has appealed the dismissal, pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 242(a)(2)(B), of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the affirmance by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals of the denial of his application under INA § 212(c) for waiver of deportation. Because Olasebikan has departed from the United States, we lack jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c) (1994); see also Cipriano v. INS, 24 F.3d 763, 764 (5th Cir.1994).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. *

Sunday Olakanpo Olasebikan, Federal prisoner # 04895-078, has appealed the dismissal, pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 242(a)(2)(B), of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the affirmance by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals of the denial of his application under INA § 212(c) for waiver of deportation. Because Olasebikan has departed from the United States, we lack jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c) (1994); see also Cipriano v. INS, 24 F.3d 763, 764 (5th Cir.1994).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 F. App'x 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olasebikan-v-ashcroft-ca5-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack