Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Nicholasville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Nicholasville

280 S.W.2d 522, 1955 Ky. LEXIS 171

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedJune 17, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 S.W.2d 522 (Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Nicholasville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Nicholasville, 280 S.W.2d 522, 1955 Ky. LEXIS 171 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

STEWART, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the refusal of the lower court to grant injunctive relief against the enforcement of compliance by Olan Mills, Inc., a nonresident corporation, with an ordinance of the City of Nicholas-ville.

That municipality imposes an annual license fee of $50 upon each photograph gallery, itinerant photographer or photographer maintaining a shop within the city limits.

This Nicholasville. ordinance, with respect to a nonresident person,-firm or corporation doing photography business in that city,.is subject to the same objection pointed out in an Elizabethtown ordinance in Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Elizabethtown, etc., Ky. 269 S.W.2d 201. The facts in this case; mutatis mutandis, are similar to those set fortlrin the City of Elizabethtown case, [523]*523and the legal principle on which the latter case turned controls here! It follows appellant was entitled to the injunctive relief it sought. See also Cordell v. Commonwealth, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 484; Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Maysville, etc., Ky., 272 S.W.2d 460.

Wherefore, the judgment is. reversed with directions that it be set aside and a new one entered declaring the ordinance void to the extent that it applies to appellant and any nonresident person, firm or corporation engaged in interstate commerce in the City of Nicholasville.

CAMMACK, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEWART, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the refusal of the lower court to grant injunctive relief against the enforcement of compliance by Olan Mills, Inc., a nonresident corporation, with an ordinance of the City of Nicholas-ville.

That municipality imposes an annual license fee of $50 upon each photograph gallery, itinerant photographer or photographer maintaining a shop within the city limits.

This Nicholasville. ordinance, with respect to a nonresident person,-firm or corporation doing photography business in that city,.is subject to the same objection pointed out in an Elizabethtown ordinance in Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Elizabethtown, etc., Ky. 269 S.W.2d 201. The facts in this case; mutatis mutandis, are similar to those set fortlrin the City of Elizabethtown case, [523]*523and the legal principle on which the latter case turned controls here! It follows appellant was entitled to the injunctive relief it sought. See also Cordell v. Commonwealth, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 484; Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Maysville, etc., Ky., 272 S.W.2d 460.

Wherefore, the judgment is. reversed with directions that it be set aside and a new one entered declaring the ordinance void to the extent that it applies to appellant and any nonresident person, firm or corporation engaged in interstate commerce in the City of Nicholasville.

CAMMACK, J., dissenting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 S.W.2d 522, 1955 Ky. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olan-mills-inc-v-city-of-nicholasville-kyctapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack