Oladipupo v. State

635 So. 2d 160, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924, 1994 WL 157003
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 1994·No. No. 93-655·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal in a criminal case. Because the court did not give adequate notice or reason for the assessment of a “state attorney fee,” that provision of the judgment is stricken. See Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oladipupo v. State, 635 So. 2d 160, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3924, 1994 WL 157003 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

635 So. 2d 160 (Oladipupo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
606 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Turkaly v. State
615 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)