Oladipupo v. INS
This text of Oladipupo v. INS (Oladipupo v. INS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 98-60268 Summary Calendar __________________
ABIDEEN OLADIPUPO, also known as Anthony A. Oladipupo,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A71-892-451 - - - - - - - - - - -
August 16, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Abideen Oladipupo appeals the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals finding him deportable, denying his
application for asylum and suspension of deportation, and denying
his motion to remand. Oladipupo also argues that he was denied
due process by his lack of representation.
After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we
find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that
Oladipupo is deportable and not eligible for asylum. Chun v.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-60268 -2-
INS, 40 F.3d at 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). We further find that the
BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Oladipupo’s motion to
remand. Ogbemudia v. INS, 988 F.2d 595, 599-600 (5th Cir. 1993).
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility
Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, is
applicable to all aliens in proceedings on April 1, 1997, for
whom a final order of deportation was entered more than thirty
days after September 30, 1996. IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(E); Eyoum v.
INS, 125 F.3d 889, 891 (5th Cir. 1997). Under IIRIRA, this court
lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review claims for
discretionary relief, such as suspension of deportation. Eyoum,
125 F.3d at 891; Pilch v. INS, 129 F.3d 969, 970 (7th Cir. 1997).
Because the BIA’s final order of deportation was entered on April
30, 1998, we lack subject matter jurisdiction to review
Oladipupo’s appeal regarding suspension of deportation.
The petition for review is DENIED. All outstanding motions
are also DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oladipupo v. INS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oladipupo-v-ins-ca5-1999.