Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/O.L. v. State

O.L. v. State

929 So. 2d 1133, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2006 WL 1476148
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2006
DocketNo. 4D04-3075
StatusPublished

This text of 929 So. 2d 1133 (O.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O.L. v. State, 929 So. 2d 1133, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2006 WL 1476148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of delinquency for aggravated battery and simple battery.

We reverse the disposition and remand for a new disposition hearing. Section 985.229(1), Florida Statutes (2004), requires that the court order and consider a predisposition report if residential commitment is “anticipated or recommended by an officer of the court or by the department.” See T.H. v. State, 859 So.2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We also note that the disposition order does not delineate the disposition for each offense and fails to account for credit for time served in a juvenile detention center. See J.W. v. State, 879 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.H. v. State
859 So. 2d 549 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
J.W. v. State
879 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 1133, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2006 WL 1476148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ol-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.