Oksoktaruk v. State

619 P.2d 480, 1980 Alas. LEXIS 635
Alaska Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 1980·No. 4147·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Oksoktaruk appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and imposing a five-year sentence for burglary not in a dwelling consecutive to another sentence of five years with two suspended imposed on him for a subsequent burglary conviction. The record of the second burglary conviction was the sole basis for the revocation of probation. Subsequent to the filing of this appeal, we reversed the second burglary conviction because of the improper admission of evidence. Oksoktaruk v. State, 611 P.2d 521 (Alaska 1980). Since the revocation of probation was based entirely on the record of the second burglary conviction, without evidence being submitted of the underlying offense, it follows that we must reverse the revocation of probation.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOCHEVER, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oksoktaruk v. State, 619 P.2d 480, 1980 Alas. LEXIS 635 (Ala. 1980).

619 P.2d 480 (Oksoktaruk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kunkel
455 N.W.2d 213 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Brown v. State
779 P.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1989)
Hernandez v. State
691 P.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1984)
McBeth v. State
652 P.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1982)
Tritt v. State
625 P.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1981)
Nelson v. State
619 P.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1980)