Okpe v. Okpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Okpe v. Okpe

136 A.D.3d 511, 24 N.Y.S.3d 902

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2016·No. 212 307847/13·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen F. Gesmer, J.), entered April 21, 2014, which, after a hearing, granted plaintiff a three-year order of protection, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that defendant committed acts warranting an order of protection in her favor (see Family Ct Act § 832). Plaintiff established that defendant committed the acts alleged in the petition, and the court’s determination is supported by the record (see Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P., 61 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen F. Gesmer, J.), entered April 21, 2014, which, after a hearing, granted plaintiff a three-year order of protection, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that defendant committed acts warranting an order of protection in her favor (see Family Ct Act § 832). Plaintiff established that defendant committed the acts alleged in the petition, and the court’s determination is supported by the record (see Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P., 61 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Okpe v. Okpe, 136 A.D.3d 511, 24 N.Y.S.3d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

136 A.D.3d 511 (Okpe v. Okpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related