Okpaleke-Ortiz v. Ortiz

127 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 6122266, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18568
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-4221
StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 3d 718 (Okpaleke-Ortiz v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Okpaleke-Ortiz v. Ortiz, 127 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 6122266, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18568 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The magistrate’s detailed findings of fact, which were adopted in their entirety by the trial court, were supported by competent substantial evidence. Trial courts are vested with discretion in determining an appropriate time-sharing arrangement between competing parents. Once a trial court makes this determination, an appellate court should not overturn that decision absent a clear abuse of discretion. Lowrey v. Lee, 873 So.2d 604, 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Here, we find no abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowrey v. Lee
873 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 6122266, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okpaleke-ortiz-v-ortiz-fladistctapp-2013.