Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 21, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00584·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU, Case No. 1:20-cv-00584-AWI-SKO

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 26)

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 On October 20, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 26.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: October 21, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc. (Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)