Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fourth Circuit

Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

684 F. App'x 324

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2017·No. No. 16-2274·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henrietta Okoro and Cyriacus Okoro appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:16-cv-00616-PX, 2016 WL 5870031 (D. Md. filed Oct. 6, 2016 & entered Oct. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [325] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henrietta Okoro and Cyriacus Okoro appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:16-cv-00616-PX, 2016 WL 5870031 (D. Md. filed Oct. 6, 2016 & entered Oct. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [325] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 684 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

684 F. App'x 324 (Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.