Okorie v. Trump
This text of Okorie v. Trump (Okorie v. Trump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NDUKA COLLINS OKORIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-03428 (UNA) ) ) DONALD JOHN TRUMP, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of Plaintiff's complaint ECF No.
1, and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), ECF No. 2. For the following
reasons, the Court grants the IFP motion and dismisses the case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)
(requiring immediate dismissal of a frivolous suit).
Plaintiff, a resident of Ontario, Canada, alleges that President Donald Trump “has not paid
any of his debts owed to me to the tune of” $3,462,000. Compl., ECF No. 1 at 5. The alleged debt
is for $462,000 worth of “art work services” rendered during the “presidential elections in
November 2016” and “translation services for Paul Trump, [alleged] brother of the defendant
costing U.S. dollar 3000000[.]” Id. at 4.
Complaints, as here, lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact,” Neitzke v. Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), or “postulating events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,”
Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981), are appropriately dismissed as
frivolous. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
2025.11.05 10:21:27 -05'00' _____________________ TREVOR N. McFADDEN Date: November 5, 2025 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Okorie v. Trump, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okorie-v-trump-dcd-2025.