Okon v. Montgomery County Council

Fourth Circuit

Okon v. Montgomery County Council

466 F. App'x 267

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2012·No. No. 11-2249·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Renee Imeh Okon appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Okon v. Montgomery Cnty. Council, No. 8:11-cv-01824-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [268]*268in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Renee Imeh Okon appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Okon v. Montgomery Cnty. Council, No. 8:11-cv-01824-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [268]*268in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Okon v. Montgomery County Council, 466 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 267 (Okon v. Montgomery County Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.