Okon v. Montgomery County Council

Fourth Circuit

Okon v. Montgomery County Council

466 F. App'x 267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2249

StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 267 (Okon v. Montgomery County Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okon v. Montgomery County Council, 466 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Renee Imeh Okon appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Okon v. Montgomery Cnty. Council, No. 8:11-cv-01824-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [268]*268in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Renee Imeh Okon appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Okon v. Montgomery Cnty. Council, No. 8:11-cv-01824-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [268]*268in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 F. App'x 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okon-v-montgomery-county-council-ca4-2012.