Okolo v. Okolo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Okolo v. Okolo

395 S.W.3d 78, 2013 WL 1305574, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 407

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 2013·No. No. WD 75076·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Patrick S. Okolo (“Husband”) appeals from a dissolution of marriage judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting a maintenance award of $450.00 per month to Respondent Nkimdilim Okolo (“Wife”). After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Patrick S. Okolo (“Husband”) appeals from a dissolution of marriage judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting a maintenance award of $450.00 per month to Respondent Nkimdilim Okolo (“Wife”). After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Okolo v. Okolo, 395 S.W.3d 78, 2013 WL 1305574, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 407 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 78 (Okolo v. Okolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.