Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Tradesmens National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Tradesmens National Bank

1936 OK 754, 62 P.2d 1223, 178 Okla. 259, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 563

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 1, 1936

DocketNo. 26010.

StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK 754 (Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Tradesmens National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Tradesmens National Bank, 1936 OK 754, 62 P.2d 1223, 178 Okla. 259, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 563 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

WELCH, J.

This case was argued and submitted with cause No. 26011, Oklahoma Tax Commission v. First National Bank of Oklahoma City, this day decided, 178 Okla. 260, 62 P. (2d) 1220. The pleadings of the parties, the judgment rendered, and the questions here presented are substantially the *260 same. The Tax Commission’s brief in cause No. 26011 is by specific request treated as its brief in this case.

The reasoning of the opinion in cause 26011 is applicable here, and the conclusion there is controlling here. We, therefore, adopt the syllabus of that opinion and upon that authority the judgment here considered is modified to exclude any judgment for costs, and in all other respects is .affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J„ OSBORN, Y. C. X, and PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY, ¡BAYLESS, and BUSBY, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELCH, J.

This case was argued and submitted with cause No. 26011, Oklahoma Tax Commission v. First National Bank of Oklahoma City, this day decided, 178 Okla. 260, 62 P. (2d) 1220. The pleadings of the parties, the judgment rendered, and the questions here presented are substantially the *260 same. The Tax Commission’s brief in cause No. 26011 is by specific request treated as its brief in this case.

The reasoning of the opinion in cause 26011 is applicable here, and the conclusion there is controlling here. We, therefore, adopt the syllabus of that opinion and upon that authority the judgment here considered is modified to exclude any judgment for costs, and in all other respects is .affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J„ OSBORN, Y. C. X, and PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY, ¡BAYLESS, and BUSBY, JJ., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1936 OK 754, 62 P.2d 1223, 178 Okla. 259, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oklahoma-tax-commission-v-tradesmens-national-bank-okla-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack