Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Martin
This text of 1980 OK 153 (Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner’s application to assume original jurisdiction GRANTED. The question of the right of the public or the media to attend a mental competency hearing or trial, conducted under the provision of Title 43A, Okla.Stat., wherein the alleged mentally incompetent is the subject of criminal proceedings, is rendered moot by the enactment of H.B. No. 1836, Thirty-Seventh Legislature, Second Regular Session.
Hereafter, all proceedings conducted pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1980, §§ 1175.1 to 1175.8 (H.B.1836), shall be publicly conducted to the same extent as criminal trials. For the impact of Federal Constitutional Law, See: Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980). While 43A O.S.Supp. 1978, § 54.1, requires that civil mental health “records shall be open to public inspection only by order of the court to persons having a legitimate interest therein”, no such provision is found in 22 O.S.Supp. 1980, § 1175.1, et seq.
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION/MANDAMUS DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1980 OK 153, 618 P.2d 944, 1980 Okla. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oklahoma-publishing-co-v-martin-okla-1980.