Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Wilson

1921 OK 385, 202 P. 279, 84 Okla. 116, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 404

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 15, 1921

Docket10310

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK 385 (Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Wilson, 1921 OK 385, 202 P. 279, 84 Okla. 116, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 404 (Okla. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

KANE, J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Upon trial (o a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

* As this action differs in no material respect in either the facts or the questions of law involved from Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. A. P. Wilson and Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Ila McGhee, and Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Roy McGhee, in which opinions have been this day handed down, it will not be necessary to restate the facts or reconsider the assignments of error presented for review.

Upon the authority of the former cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HARRISON, C. J„ and JOHNSON, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ.,-concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Upon trial (o a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

* As this action differs in no material respect in either the facts or the questions of law involved from Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. A. P. Wilson and Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Ila McGhee, and Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Roy McGhee, in which opinions have been this day handed down, it will not be necessary to restate the facts or reconsider the assignments of error presented for review.

Upon the authority of the former cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HARRISON, C. J„ and JOHNSON, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ.,-concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK 385, 202 P. 279, 84 Okla. 116, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oklahoma-k-m-r-co-v-wilson-okla-1921.