Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Bonaparte

1935 OK 768, 50 P.2d 410, 174 Okla. 367, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1241
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 10, 1935
DocketNo. 25972.
StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK 768 (Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Bonaparte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Bonaparte, 1935 OK 768, 50 P.2d 410, 174 Okla. 367, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1241 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by Oklahoma Furniture Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against E. B. Bonaparte, county treasurer, for the purpose of recovering- certain alleged illegal taxes paid under -protest. Separate suits were brought for the first and last half of taxes alleged to be illegal and ‘were consolidated at the trial. By proper orders successive county treasurers were made defendants to the action. General demurrers were overruled and defendants answered by general denial. Two causes of action in each of the amended petitions were set up; the first being for the recovery of alleged illegal taxes by reason of an increase in the assessed valuation of plaintiff’s real estate; and the second cause of (action being for alleged illegal personal tax. The record in this case presents substantially the same state of facts as were presented in the case of J. R. Keaton v. E. B. Bonaparte, County Treasurer, Oklahoma County, et al., 174 Okla. 316. 50 P. (2d) 404, and Baker, Hanna, Blake & Co. v. E. B. Bonaparte County Treasurer, 174 Okla. 366, 50 P. (2d) 409 and the authorities herein cited and relied upon are identical with the authorities presented in the above cases, and the conclusion we have reached in the above, cases applies with equal force and intensity to this appeal. It is unnecessary to repeat what we have therein said. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ„ concur. BAYLESS and BUSBY, JJ„ absent. PHELPS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keaton v. Bonaparte
1935 OK 757 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Baker, Hanna, Blake & Co. v. Bonaparte
1935 OK 728 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 768, 50 P.2d 410, 174 Okla. 367, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oklahoma-furniture-mfg-co-v-bonaparte-okla-1935.