Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab

1911 OK 313, 118 P. 351, 30 Okla. 32, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 412
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 26, 1911
Docket1138
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1911 OK 313 (Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab, 1911 OK 313, 118 P. 351, 30 Okla. 32, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 412 (Okla. 1911).

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

This case arises out of the same accident as the Saida Barkett case, which has just been decided, Oklahoma City Railway Company v. Barkett, ante, 118 Pac. 350. The cases were tried together in the lower court, although separate verdicts were rendered, and the cases have been briefed and argued orally together in this court.

The instruction complained of in this case is identical with the instruction complained of in the Barkett case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case this should also be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Igo v. State
267 P.2d 1082 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1954)
Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. Fonville
1912 OK 389 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK 313, 118 P. 351, 30 Okla. 32, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oklahoma-city-ry-co-v-diab-okla-1911.