Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab

1911 OK 313, 118 P. 351, 30 Okla. 32, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 412
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 26, 1911·No. 1138·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

This case arises out of the same accident as the Saida Barkett case, which has just been decided, Oklahoma City Railway Company v. Barkett, ante, 118 Pac. 350. The cases were tried together in the lower court, although separate verdicts were rendered, and the cases have been briefed and argued orally together in this court.

The instruction complained of in this case is identical with the instruction complained of in the Barkett case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case this should also be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab, 1911 OK 313, 118 P. 351, 30 Okla. 32, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 412 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 313 (Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. Diab) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Igo v. State
267 P.2d 1082 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1954)
Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. Fonville
1912 OK 389 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)