Okin v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Supreme Court

Okin v. Securities & Exchange Commission

325 U.S. 840, 65 S. Ct. 1569, 89 L. Ed. 1966, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 1863

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 18, 1945

DocketNo. 1245

StatusPublished

This text of 325 U.S. 840 (Okin v. Securities & Exchange Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okin v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 325 U.S. 840, 65 S. Ct. 1569, 89 L. Ed. 1966, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 1863 (1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On consideration of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and a motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the question whether that part of the Commission’s order which licensed Electric Bond and Share Company’s use of the proceeds derived from the plan of reorganization can be reviewed only under § 24 (a) of the Public Utility Hold[841]*841ing Company Act. The judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration of that question.

Mr. Samuel Okin for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Cox and Mr. Roger S. Foster for respondent. Messrs. Janies L. Boone and Daniel James for the United Gas Corporation et al., petitioning for writ of certiorari to correct diminution of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

On consideration of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and a motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the question whether that part of the Commission’s order which licensed Electric Bond and Share Company’s use of the proceeds derived from the plan of reorganization can be reviewed only under § 24 (a) of the Public Utility Hold[841]*841ing Company Act. The judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration of that question.

Mr. Samuel Okin for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Cox and Mr. Roger S. Foster for respondent. Messrs. Janies L. Boone and Daniel James for the United Gas Corporation et al., petitioning for writ of certiorari to correct diminution of the record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 U.S. 840, 65 S. Ct. 1569, 89 L. Ed. 1966, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 1863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okin-v-securities-exchange-commission-scotus-1945.