Okin v. Essex Sales Company
138 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 181, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 319
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Okin v. Essex Sales Company, 138 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 181, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1927).
138 A. 922 (Okin v. Essex Sales Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.