OKIE MOORE DIVING & SALVAGE v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

OKIE MOORE DIVING & SALVAGE v. Watkins

239 S.W.3d 631, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663, 2007 WL 4234374

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 4, 2007

DocketED 88921

StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W.3d 631 (OKIE MOORE DIVING & SALVAGE v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

OKIE MOORE DIVING & SALVAGE v. Watkins, 239 S.W.3d 631, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663, 2007 WL 4234374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation subrogation case, the plaintiff-employer, Okie Moore Diving & Salvage, appeals from the trial court’s entry of a directed verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant, Ray Watkins. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation subrogation case, the plaintiff-employer, Okie Moore Diving & Salvage, appeals from the trial court’s entry of a directed verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant, Ray Watkins. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 S.W.3d 631, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663, 2007 WL 4234374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okie-moore-diving-salvage-v-watkins-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack