Oken v. State

852 A.2d 97, 381 Md. 705, 2004 Md. LEXIS 313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oken v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 378 Md. 179
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 14, 2004·No. Misc. Nos. 33, 34·Published

Opinion

[706]*706ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered the Motion for Stay of Warrant of Execution and Request for Immediate Hearing, the Application for Leave to Appeal from the denial of a motion to reopen the post-conviction case, the State’s response to the Motion and Application and Oken’s response to the State’s answer, it is this 14th day of June, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Motion and Application be, and they are hereby, DENIED.

Chief Judge BELL dissents and would grant the Application for Leave to Appeal and the requested Stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oken v. State, 852 A.2d 97, 381 Md. 705, 2004 Md. LEXIS 313 (Md. 2004).

852 A.2d 97 (Oken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.