O'Kelly v. Barbee

25 S.E.2d 750, 223 N.C. 282, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 258
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 2, 1943·Published

Opinion

DeNNY, J.

We do not think the evidence on this record, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, establishes actionable negligence on the part of defendant. The accident occurred at night, after the lights on defendant’s automobile blew out and before the car was stopped, which according to the evidence was immediately thereafter. The automobile was stopped within about the car’s length of where the accident occurred. The defendant was confronted with an emergency, and the evidence does not disclose a failure on his part to exercise ordinary care in the operation of his automobile under the circumstances. Mills v. Moore, 219 N. C., 25, 12 S. E. (2d), 661; Grimes v. Coach Co., 203 N. C., 605, 166 S. E., 599.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Kelly v. Barbee, 25 S.E.2d 750, 223 N.C. 282, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 258 (N.C. 1943).

25 S.E.2d 750 (O'Kelly v. Barbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimes v. Carolina Coach Co.
166 S.E. 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Mills v. . Moore
12 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Mills v. Moore
219 N.C. 25 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)