Okello v. Okello

Missouri Court of Appeals

Okello v. Okello

497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 844, 2016 WL 4525307

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 30, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103787

StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.3d 355 (Okello v. Okello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okello v. Okello, 497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 844, 2016 WL 4525307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kimberly Okello (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, dissolving the marriage of Wife and Samson Okello (“Husband”) and providing for the custody and support of the parties’ two minor children, enforcing a consent agreement between them. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for' their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kimberly Okello (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, dissolving the marriage of Wife and Samson Okello (“Husband”) and providing for the custody and support of the parties’ two minor children, enforcing a consent agreement between them. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for' their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 844, 2016 WL 4525307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okello-v-okello-moctapp-2016.