Okello v. Okello

Missouri Court of Appeals

Okello v. Okello

497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 844, 2016 WL 4525307

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2016·No. No. ED 103787·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kimberly Okello (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, dissolving the marriage of Wife and Samson Okello (“Husband”) and providing for the custody and support of the parties’ two minor children, enforcing a consent agreement between them. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for' their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kimberly Okello (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, dissolving the marriage of Wife and Samson Okello (“Husband”) and providing for the custody and support of the parties’ two minor children, enforcing a consent agreement between them. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for' their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Okello v. Okello, 497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 844, 2016 WL 4525307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 355 (Okello v. Okello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.