Okello v. Holder

553 F. App'x 342
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 2014
DocketNo. 13-1720
StatusPublished

This text of 553 F. App'x 342 (Okello v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Okello v. Holder, 553 F. App'x 342 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nancy Jescker Okello, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir.2009) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Okello (B.I.A.May 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Narine v. Holder
559 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okello-v-holder-ca4-2014.