Okeke v. State

613 S.E.2d 125, 272 Ga. App. 529, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 791, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 208
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 7, 2005·No. A05A0583·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

Appearing pro se, Sylvanus Okeke appeals from his conviction for family violence battery. In his notice of appeal, however, Okeke did not request that a trial transcript be included as part of the appellate record. The absence of the trial transcript makes it impossible for this Court to review Okeke’s enumerations of error concerning the sufficiency of the evidence, the admission of evidence, and other rulings below. “It is the burden of the complaining party, including pro se appellants, to compile a complete record of what happened at the trial level, and when this is not done, there is nothing for the appellate court to review.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Farris v. State, 236 Ga. App. 241 (511 SE2d 601) (1999). We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

Blackburn, P. J., and Bernes, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Okeke v. State, 613 S.E.2d 125, 272 Ga. App. 529, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 791, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 208 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).

613 S.E.2d 125 (Okeke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daker v. State
792 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Holman v. the State
765 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Ulysses Holman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Smith v. State
757 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Lugo v. State
620 S.E.2d 591 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)