Okeke v. Commissioner of Public Health

4 A.3d 832, 298 Conn. 915, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 350
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 2010
DocketSC 18677
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.3d 832 (Okeke v. Commissioner of Public Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Okeke v. Commissioner of Public Health, 4 A.3d 832, 298 Conn. 915, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 350 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 373 (AC 31054), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that under General Statutes § 19a-42 (d) (1), the commissioner of public health had neither the duty nor the authority to amend the child’s birth certificate, where the name on the birth certificate differed from that [916]*916agreed by the parents on an acknowledgment of paternity form?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18677. Edward C. Okeke, pro se, in support of the petition. Daniel Shapiro, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided September 15, 2010

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Okeke v. Commissioner of Public Health
39 A.3d 1095 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.3d 832, 298 Conn. 915, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeke-v-commissioner-of-public-health-conn-2010.