Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald
This text of 719 So. 2d 347 (Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We summarily dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the challenged order denying Petitioner’s motion to amend its answer to add a demand for jury trial. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We also certify conflict with Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. Pate, 563 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Quality Coffee Service, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 474 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); and Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12658, 1998 WL 660383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeelanta-corp-v-mcdonald-fladistctapp-1998.