Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald

719 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12658, 1998 WL 660383
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1998·No. No. 98-3220·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the challenged order denying Petitioner’s motion to amend its answer to add a demand for jury trial. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We also certify conflict with Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. Pate, 563 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Quality Coffee Service, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 474 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); and Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

DELL, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald, 719 So. 2d 347, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12658, 1998 WL 660383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

719 So. 2d 347 (Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire
670 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. Pate
563 So. 2d 1122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Lindsey v. Sherman
402 So. 2d 1349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc.
421 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Quality Coffee Servoce, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola
474 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)