O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe

491 So. 2d 342, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1594, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8987

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 1986

DocketNo. 86-1143

StatusPublished

This text of 491 So. 2d 342 (O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe, 491 So. 2d 342, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1594, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8987 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting the husband’s argument that the appeal is premature because the lower court expressed a willingness to hear additional relevant testimony, we reverse the lower court’s denial of the wife’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order. We do, however, find that the lower court’s ruling was premature. The record reveals that the judge terminated the hearing and ruled on the wife’s motion without affording the parties a full opportunity to testify; thus, the court lacked information necessary to enable it to render an informed decision.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting the husband’s argument that the appeal is premature because the lower court expressed a willingness to hear additional relevant testimony, we reverse the lower court’s denial of the wife’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order. We do, however, find that the lower court’s ruling was premature. The record reveals that the judge terminated the hearing and ruled on the wife’s motion without affording the parties a full opportunity to testify; thus, the court lacked information necessary to enable it to render an informed decision.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 So. 2d 342, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1594, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeeffe-v-okeeffe-fladistctapp-1986.