O'Keeffe v. Fava

278 A.D.2d 393, 718 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for specific [394]*394performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered December 9, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The allegations in the complaint are sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) (see, Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Keeffe v. Fava, 278 A.D.2d 393, 718 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 393 (O'Keeffe v. Fava) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AAA Viza, Inc. v. Business Payment Systems, LLC
38 A.D.3d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)