O'Keeffe v. Fava
This text of 278 A.D.2d 393 (O'Keeffe v. Fava) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for specific [394]*394performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered December 9, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The allegations in the complaint are sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) (see, Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D.2d 393, 718 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeeffe-v-fava-nyappdiv-2000.