O'Keefe v. United States
This text of 231 Ct. Cl. 804 (O'Keefe v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by a physician for payments allegedly due to him under Part B of the Medicare program, 42 U.S.C. §1395(j) et seq. On January 25, 1980, this court suspended proceedings in the case pending the resolution of Erika, Inc. v. United States, Ct. Cl. No. 374-77, which was then pending in this court. Erika, Inc., has now been decided by the Supreme Court (United States v. Erika, Inc., 456 U.S. 201 (1982)), and defendant renews its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Now that the Supreme Court has held in Erika, supra, that this court has no jurisdiction to review determinations of benefits payable under Part B of the Medicare program, we grant defendant’s motion and dismiss the instant petition on the authority of that decision. The petitions are dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 Ct. Cl. 804, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 389, 1982 WL 25235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeefe-v-united-states-cc-1982.