O'Keefe v. O'Keefe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'Keefe v. O'Keefe

448 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12436

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 28, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1628

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 553 (O'Keefe v. O'Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Keefe v. O'Keefe, 448 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a dissolution of marriage case where the parties, being dissatisfied with various portions of the final judgment as concerns financial matters, have filed an appeal and a cross-appeal.

[554]*554With the exception hereafter noted, we affirm upon authority of Canakaris v. Ca-nakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

We opine that the trial court erred in failing to order appellee, Edmund H. O’Keefe, to provide medical insurance coverage for the minor children of the marriage when appellee offered to continue to provide such coverage. Thiel v. Thiel, 426 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HURLEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI