O'Keefe v. Krapf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Keefe v. Krapf

219 A.D. 739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D. 739 (O'Keefe v. Krapf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Keefe v. Krapf, 219 A.D. 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Order setting aside verdict, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law and the facts, and verdict and judgment reinstated, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that the carpet was the property of defendant, and that it was furnished by him and repaired by him. The only part of the premises rented to plaintiff was the apartment on the floor above, and she was under no obligation to keep the carpet in repair. That obligation was assumed by defendant. Jaycox, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Manning, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside verdict, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law and the facts, and verdict and judgment reinstated, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that the carpet was the property of defendant, and that it was furnished by him and repaired by him. The only part of the premises rented to plaintiff was the apartment on the floor above, and she was under no obligation to keep the carpet in repair. That obligation was assumed by defendant. Jaycox, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Manning, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeefe-v-krapf-nyappdiv-1927.