O'Keefe v. Chisholm
This text of 135 S. Ct. 2311 (O'Keefe v. Chisholm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Motion of The Maciver Institute for Public Policy for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Motion of Cause of Action for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Motion of Center for Competitive Politics, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiaegranted. Motion of The Cato Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Motion of respondents John T. Chisolm, David Robles, and Bruce J. Langraf for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S. Ct. 2311, 191 L. Ed. 2d 1000, 83 U.S.L.W. 3857, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeefe-v-chisholm-scotus-2015.