O'Kane v. O'Kane

660 So. 2d 421, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1995 WL 553070
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 20, 1995·No. No. 94-2865·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993); Tremblay v. Tremblay, 638 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Stockburger v. Stockburger, 633 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Baez v. Baez, 627 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 975 (Fla.1994); Tamari v. Turko-Tamari, 599 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lenders v. Durham, 564 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Hill v. Hill, 548 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 560 So.2d 233 (Fla.1990); Sherman v. Sherman, 558 So.2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Landa v. Landa, 539 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Kane v. O'Kane, 660 So. 2d 421, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1995 WL 553070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 421 (O'Kane v. O'Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landa v. Landa
539 So. 2d 543 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Tremblay v. Tremblay
638 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Mize v. Mize
621 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Lenders v. Durham
564 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Stockburger v. Stockburger
633 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sherman v. Sherman
558 So. 2d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Tamari v. Turko-Tamari
599 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hill v. Hill
548 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Baez v. Baez
627 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)